![]() |
|||||||||
'The test case for development' revisited-- Akbar Ali Khan Economy: Changes, challenges and policy directions-- Mirza Azizul Islam Socio-economic progress and shaping the future-- Qazi Kholiquzzaman Ahmad How fares the Bangladesh economy? -- Rizwanul Islam FDI in Bangladesh-- Mamun Rashid Guide to invest in capital market -- Ruhul Ameen Preying on poor migrant workers: Fix the fixers-- CR Abrar SME route to development-- Zaid Bakht Statistics speak, they don't!-- Dr Saadat Husain The folly of exaggerated expectation-- Rashad Ahmed To garner domestic resource -- Dr Fahmida Khatun
|
|||||||||
To garner domestic resource Dr Fahmida Khatun
The context The above arguments in favour of domestic resource mobilization are also applicable for Bangladesh to a large extent. Bangladesh has been enjoying a steady economic growth and notable improvements in social indicators. With a relatively sound macroeconomic management the country has been able achieve the growth of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) at an average rate of 5.8 percent during the past decade. In the past three years GDP growth rate averaged at 5.9 per annum percent. The per capita income has risen to USD 684 in 2010 from USD 334 in 2000. Other major economic indicators such as inflation, export earnings, foreign exchange reserve and domestic debt have been more or less within a reasonable grip. A robust GDP growth and positive macroeconomic fundamentals have contributed to poverty reduction during the past decade. According to the Household Income and Expenditure Survey (HIES) of the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS) poverty rate fell from 56.6 percent in 1991-92 to 40.0 percent in 2005. Though growing inequality has emerged as a major concern since income accruing to top 5 percent of the households was 20.85 times higher compared to that of bottom 5 percent households in the HIES of 2005 the pace of poverty reduction has been faster during the recent past. If poverty reduced by 1 percent per annum in the 1990s, the rate of poverty reduction accelerated between 2000 and 2005. Bangladesh has also reduced its dependency on foreign aid by a remarkable rate since its independence. In 2010 the share of overseas development assistance (ODA) in GDP has declined to 2.2 per cent from 5.8 percent in 1981. When compared with the Annual Development Programme (ADP) the share of ODA is set to be around 41 in FY11 compared to 53.2 percent in FY2000. Albeit an impressive economic growth the country suffers from an imbalance between the public expenditure and revenue, among many other shortcomings of the economy. Over the years fiscal deficits have increased, from an average of 3 percent of GDP per annum in the 1980s to about 5 percent in the 1990s and 2000s. The imbalance has led the country to reply on borrowing from both internal and external sources to meet up its public expenditure requirements.
Fiscal deficits Resource mobilisation effort by the government The growth in income tax during July-October of the FY11 has been 29.2 percent against the target of 22.4 percent for the whole fiscal year. The growth in total tax collection during the first four months of the FY11 is 25.7 percent as opposed to the annual target of 16.8 percent. However, even with such spectacular growth in tax collection, the tax-GDP ratio is well below the requirement for a dynamic move towards the next trajectory of development. Financial markets and intermediation for the private sector In addition to banks and other financial institutions, the development of capital market is necessary to achieve efficiency of capital allocation. In contrast to banks which finance only well-established and safe borrowers stock markets can finance risky and innovative investment projects. In Bangladesh capital market is not a matured one though market capitalization has increased significantly over a short period of time. Market capitalization as a percentage of GDP has increased from just 1.4 percent in FY91 to 39 percent in FY10 and total number of companies increased to 243 in FY10 from 149 in FY91. Though the capital market experienced buoyancy in the recent period it also experiences volatility due to both economic and non-economic factors. The depth of the market is also shallow as it lacks sectoral diversification and has a concentration of the financial sector which again is represented mainly by the banking sector. Hence the opportunity to finance large infrastructural projects through raising funds from foreign portfolio investment, off-loading of shares of the state owned enterprises and various equity and bonds from the capital market is still limited. Public private partnership Policy issues While addressing the issue of domestic resource mobilization both policy and institutional aspects have to be considered. Measures such as reorganization of tax slabs, reduction of tax holidays and imposition of tax at source from the real estate developers at the time of registration are positive measures for higher tax revenue. A number of other measures have been proposed in the national budget of FY11 to increase the tax collection. Some of these include: e-filing of income tax returns on a limited basis; installment of tax calculator software on the website of NBR; restructuring of manpower and other facilities of income tax department; motivational programme for taxpayers of income tax and VAT; introduction of a two page income tax return form; introduction of tax card for highest taxpayers; initiation of e-VAT software; reforms in judicial process for easy settlement of VAT related cases; massive reforms in VAT administration including setting up more VAT offices and recruit officials, setting up VAT offices in each upazilla consisting of one inspector, one data entry operator and two sepoys. These are praiseworthy initiatives. However, implementation of these will require a transparent and accountable tax administration which should not only be supported by efficient human resources with integrity but should also work independently and impartially without any political influence. Finally, enhancement of resource mobilization also depends on the utilization of resources. If the taxpayers are not convinced and confident of the proper utilization of their hard earned money the generation of resources becomes difficult. Therefore, there has to be clarity and transparency on the purpose of resource allocation for investment so that in case of failure to meet the stated purpose the responsible authority can be made accountable. This is also required for ensuring the quality of expenditures so that resources spent by the public representatives can contribute to employment generation and poverty reduction in a sustainable manner. Dr Fahmida Khatun is an economist and head of research at Centre for Policy Dialogue, Dhaka. |